12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

89%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 71%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 64%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 95%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 56%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 95%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 57%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 66%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

83%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

87%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 95%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 72%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 66%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands