12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

63%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

88%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Snow traction

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 87%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 83%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 77%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

Snow performance

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 88%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 72%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

74%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Dry performance

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 86%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 77%

Dry driving behavior

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 73%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 71%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

83%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

64%

Mileage

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 76%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 69%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 50%

Fuel efficiency

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 90%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 83%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

75%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

71%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

Exterior noise

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 72%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 69%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 55%

Interior noise

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 60%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

Ice braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 89%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 71%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 89%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 82%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	34,8	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	1,7	2,2	2,5	3,7	3,0	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,1	2,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	1,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2,4	2,4	1,9	2,2	2,8	2,0	1,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands