12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

87%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

63%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

89%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

88%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 87%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 83%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 77%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

Snow performance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 88%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 72%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

74%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Dry performance

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 81%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 77%

Dry driving behavior

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 73%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 71%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

83%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

74%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

64%

Mileage

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 76%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 76%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 61%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 50%

Fuel efficiency

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 83%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

75%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

71%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

67%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

Exterior noise

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 72%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 69%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 56%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 55%

Interior noise

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 60%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 89%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 82%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 74%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

Ice braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 71%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	34,8	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	1,7	2,2	2,5	3,7	3,0	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,1	2,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	1,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	1,8	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2,4	2,4	1,9	2,2	2,8	2,0	1,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands