18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

63%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Snow traction

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 83%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Snow performance

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Dry performance

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 86%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Dry driving behavior

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 73%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

64%

Fuel efficiency

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

71%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

Exterior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 69%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 55%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Interior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 82%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Ice braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	1,7	2,2	2,5	3,7	3,0	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,1	2,9	2,5	3,4	2,5	1,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands