Segment
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama W.drive V905 and Falken EuroWinter HS01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama W.drive V905 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the W.drive V905 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama W.drive V905
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 36,6 | 29,5 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,1 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Show test details | |||||||