Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Yokohama (46%). The first tyre test of Yokohama W.drive V905 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the W.drive V905 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested.

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Yokohama W.drive V905

/0%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

/82%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R16 - R19

R14 - R22

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

Snow handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Snow performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 75%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 27%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Dry performance

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

Dry lane changing

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 74%

Fuel efficiency

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

Price/value

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

66%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands