18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72.2%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72.2%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

80%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

61.4%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

79%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.6%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.8%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74.8%