18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R19	R13 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

80%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

79%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74.8%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands