18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R19	R15 - R19	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Barum Polaris 5 13x

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

5. Barum Polaris 5 9.

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

6. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

3. Barum Polaris 5 2023

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Barum Polaris 5 Good

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

6. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

65%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Wet braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

5. Barum Polaris 5 63%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 60%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

6. Barum Polaris 5 64%

Wet circle cornering

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 66%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 64%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 68%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

6. Barum Polaris 5 65%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

6. Barum Polaris 5 56%

Wet performance

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 84%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 75%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 68%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

6. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

4. Barum Polaris 5 C

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

81%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 78%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

5. Barum Polaris 5 76%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 84%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 79%

4. Barum Polaris 5 78%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 71%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 79%

5. Barum Polaris 5 0%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 78%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 75%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

6. Barum Polaris 5 72%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

89%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

74%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Barum
Polaris 5

62%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

5. Barum Polaris 5 69%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 51%

Dry driving behavior

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 64%

5. Barum Polaris 5 51%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 92%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 87%

3. Barum Polaris 5 78%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 75%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry performance

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 86%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 76%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 69%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Barum Polaris 5 0%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

80%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 87%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 86%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

6. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Mileage

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Barum Polaris 5 72%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 67%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 57%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 79%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 74%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 79%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Barum
Polaris 5

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

66%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

4. Barum Polaris 5 74%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 64%

Interior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Barum Polaris 5 76%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 77%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 67%

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

Comfort

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 92%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

6. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

6. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

65%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 77%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 46%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Barum Polaris 5 87%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 78%

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands