18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R19	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Barum Polaris 5 2023

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Barum Polaris 5 Good

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Wet braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

5. Barum Polaris 5 63%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

5. Barum Polaris 5 64%

Wet circle cornering

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

4. Barum Polaris 5 66%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

5. Barum Polaris 5 65%

Wet handling

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Barum Polaris 5 56%

Wet performance

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

5. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

4. Barum Polaris 5 C

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Barum Polaris 5 78%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Barum Polaris 5 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 75%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

5. Barum Polaris 5 72%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

5. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

89%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

62%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

5. Barum Polaris 5 69%

Dry driving behavior

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 64%

5. Barum Polaris 5 51%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 92%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 87%

3. Barum Polaris 5 78%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry performance

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 86%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 69%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 100%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 63%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

5. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

80%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Mileage

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Barum Polaris 5 72%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 74%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 47%

Fuel efficiency

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 86%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

5. Barum Polaris 5 0%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 79%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Barum
Polaris 5

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

66%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

3. Barum Polaris 5 74%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Interior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 67%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

Comfort

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 92%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

5. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

5. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

5. Barum Polaris 5 77%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Barum Polaris 5 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 78%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands