Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Barum Polaris 5 76

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Barum Polaris 5 13x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

3. Barum Polaris 5 9.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

3. Barum Polaris 5 26.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Barum Polaris 5 2023

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Barum Polaris 5 Good

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

3. Barum Polaris 5 63%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

3. Barum Polaris 5 64%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

2. Barum Polaris 5 66%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

3. Barum Polaris 5 65%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Barum Polaris 5 56%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Barum Polaris 5 C

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Barum Polaris 5 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 82%

3. Barum Polaris 5 0%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 75%

3. Barum Polaris 5 72%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

89%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Barum
Polaris 5

62%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

3. Barum Polaris 5 69%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Barum Polaris 5 51%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 92%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Barum
Polaris 5

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 74%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Barum Polaris 5 72%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

1. Barum Polaris 5 E

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Barum
Polaris 5

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

66%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Barum Polaris 5 74%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Barum Polaris 5 76%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

3. Barum Polaris 5 61%

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

3. Barum Polaris 5 77%

1. Barum Polaris 5 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%