Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Yokohama (26%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A has C wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.
| # | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
