12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 /0%	Kumho PorTran CW51 /0%	Bridgestone Turanza T005 /88%	Bridgestone Blizzak W810 /0%	Michelin AGILIS ALPIN /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R14 - R23	R14 - R17	R15 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 56

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 23

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 21

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 19

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 1x

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 1x

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 1x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 8.

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 8.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11.

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 8

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 2019

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 2019

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2019

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 2019

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Good

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

81%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

64%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

55%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

50%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 59%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 56%

Wet performance

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 82%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 73%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 58%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 49%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 44%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 78%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 75%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 49%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 40%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 40%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

2. Kumho PorTran CW51 72%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 61%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 61%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 69%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 46%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 34%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 32%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 73%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 67%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 A

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 B

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN B

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 C

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

79%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

70%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

69%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

85%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

68%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

59%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

49%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

49%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 66%

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 46%

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 46%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 87%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 60%

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 56%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 38%

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 38%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

83%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

73%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

56%

Exterior noise

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 87%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 81%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 71%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 62%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 44%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 78%

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 77%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 71%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 75 dB

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 ?

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN ?

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

81%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

87%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

81%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

78%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

76%

Mileage

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 89%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 78%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 69%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 67%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

Fuel efficiency

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 86%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 84%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 84%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 84%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 84%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 B

2. Kumho PorTran CW51 D

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN E

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 E

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 F

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 205/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,4	2,3	2,2	2,3	2,5	2,0	1,6
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,2	3,2	3,0	2,5	2,5	2,5	2,0
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,6	4,1	3,0	2,6	3,0	3,0	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,0	4,1	2,6	2,8	3,7	3,0	2,0
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,4	2,5	2,4	3,2	2,0	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands