Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter WY01 and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C rating.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||