Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Yokohama (59%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental VanContact Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter WY01 and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental VanContact Winter also have B wet ratings.
# | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |