Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the BluEarth winter WY01 and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Bridgestone Blizzak W810 has C rating.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||