Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (46%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 has a better rating of 49% compared to 41% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth winter V906
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory
