12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Yokohama (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 49% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V906. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BluEarth winter V906 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 /49%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R15 - R21	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 30

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 6x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 8.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 18.83

Year of the last test

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

67%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 56%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 62%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 76%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

42%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 43%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 63%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 47%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 21%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 56%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

74%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 76%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 75%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 62%

Dry lane changing

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Dry performance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

70%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

41%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 34%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 37%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 D

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

69%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 65%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 75%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 55%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Yokohama BluEarth winter V906	37,6	27
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands