14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Yokohama (46%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 49% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V906. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the BluEarth winter V906 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 /49%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R15 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 30

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 6x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 8.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 30.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 18.83

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 2025

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

54%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

77%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

46%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 D

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906	37.9	29.0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	3+	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details