12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R13 - R23	R13 - R21	R14 - R19	R15 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

87%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

86%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78.7%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

90%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

86.3%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

84%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

79%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

70.9%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

85%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.6%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

91%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

88%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

83.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.8%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905	35,4	26,1
Falken EuroWinter HS01	37	27
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,3	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905	32,5	26
Falken EuroWinter HS01	33,9	26,1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2+	3+	2-
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2-	2-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1	2
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands