Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert
| # | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Uniroyal WinterExpert
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R23 | R14 - R22 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 32,5 | 26 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
