12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%

Dimensions	R13 - R23	R14 - R22	R14 - R19	R15 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90.2%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

63.3%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82.4%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

66.3%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74.8%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

80.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77.6%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

70.9%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%