12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R13 - R23	R14 - R22	R14 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90.2%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78.7%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

86.3%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82.4%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

70.9%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77.6%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.6%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

83.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%