Segment
2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Yokohama (59%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the BluEarth winter V905 and the Blizzak LM-001 EVO were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO has B rating.
# | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 1,9 |
Show test details |