12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R13 - R23	R14 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

Wet braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

Wet performance

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry performance

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 69%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 59%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

59%

Mileage

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 92%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Price/value

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 49%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

75%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

80%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

Interior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 67%

Comfort

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands