Segment
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 vs. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Yokohama (35%). In this particular case, the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate has a better rating of 76% compared to 47% of the Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/75 R16 test, where both the Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 and the Agilis CrossClimate were tested.
| # | Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61
| Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Test winner2. Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Recommended2. Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yokohama Bluearth VAN All Season RY61 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
