In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 and Continental EcoContact 6, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the BluEarth RV-02 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 has A wet grip rating, whereas 54% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2020 | 235/55 R17 | View |
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Continental EcoContact 6
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.