Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Yokohama (58%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the BluEarth RV-02 and the Turanza T005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (68%) of the Bridgestone Turanza T005 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Recommended | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||