• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Michelin Primacy 4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Primacy 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Michelin Primacy 4 also have A wet ratings.

# Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
/0%
Michelin Primacy 4
/82%

Add to comparison

Yokohama
Michelin
DimensionsR14 - R19 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name WetDry
Best values in test146134
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
Rating: Sufficient
91113
Michelin Primacy 4
Rating: Highly recommended
125133
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE5137,732,2
Michelin Primacy 436,229,3
Show test details