Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Michelin Primacy 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and Michelin Primacy 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Michelin Primacy 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Michelin Primacy 3 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Michelin Primacy 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
