Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the Maxxis Premitra HP5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Premitra HP5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Maxxis Premitra HP5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Highly recommended | 146 | 106 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 37,3 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||