Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Yokohama (57%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and Kleber Dynaxer HP3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 first tested.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
