Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
