Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Yokohama (57%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,8 | 27,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||