Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Yokohama (57%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,8 | 27,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
