Segment
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Efficient Grip Performance 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 also have A wet ratings.
# | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 128 | 130 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 36,8 | 29,7 | |||||
Show test details |