Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Roadhawk were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Firestone Roadhawk also have A wet ratings.
# | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
Show test details |