• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Continental EcoContact 6

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 has A wet grip rating, whereas 52% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.

# Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
/0%
Continental EcoContact 6
/48%

Add to comparison

Yokohama
Continental
DimensionsR14 - R19 R13 - R24
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name WetDry
Best values in test146134
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
Rating: Sufficient
91113
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Good
101134
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE5137,732,2
Continental EcoContact 636,432,7
Show test details