Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 has A wet grip rating, whereas 52% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
# | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R24 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Good | 101 | 134 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
Show test details |