Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and Continental EcoContact 6, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 has A wet grip rating, whereas 54% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
| Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Good | 101 | 134 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||