• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Bridgestone Turanza T005 also have A wet ratings.

# Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
/0%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
/91%

Add to comparison

Yokohama
Bridgestone
DimensionsR14 - R19 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name WetDry
Best values in test146134
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
Rating: Sufficient
91113
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Highly recommended
137127
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE5137,732,2
Bridgestone Turanza T00535,827,5
Show test details