Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Bridgestone Turanza T005 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended | 137 | 127 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||