Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle
1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Sufficient | 108 | 108 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||