Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
| # | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
This head-to-head comparison examines the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 and the Vredestein Sportrac 5 across available independent test data and gives a concise verdict on which summer tyre performs better overall. Both tyres are current models in our database and have not been replaced by newer versions at the time of these tests.
Test summary (Autobild summer tyre test):
- Vredestein Sportrac 5 — position 11 of 50
- Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 — position 13 of 50
With only the Autobild ranking available for direct comparison, the Sportrac 5 outperformed the Bluearth AE-50 by two places in a 50-tyre field. That gap indicates a measurable but not large advantage for Vredestein in the overall test ranking. Below we summarize strengths and weaknesses inferred from the comparative result and the tyre families these models belong to.
Vredestein Sportrac 5 — Verdict
- Strengths: The Sportrac 5’s higher position (11/50) suggests it delivered stronger overall performance in the Autobild test suite. In practical terms this typically means a balanced combination of wet and dry grip, predictable handling and competitive braking scores for its class. The result points to reliable all-round performance for drivers prioritising sportier handling with solid safety margins.
- Weaknesses: Although well-placed, the Sportrac 5 did not top the table — meaning there may be small compromises compared with premium sport tyres, such as slightly higher rolling resistance or marginally less comfort than economy-focused tyres. Buyers focused purely on lowest rolling resistance or comfort may find alternatives.
- Learn more: Manufacturer details and full model page are available at Vredestein and the test page for the tyre here.
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 — Verdict
- Strengths: Finishing 13th of 50 shows the Bluearth AE-50 is a strong contender in the mid-to-upper range of tested summer tyres. The Bluearth family historically focuses on fuel efficiency, low rolling resistance and comfort, which explains why this tyre places close behind the Sportrac 5. It is a good choice for drivers seeking a quieter, fuel-efficient summer tyre with competent performance in everyday driving conditions.
- Weaknesses: The two-place gap to Vredestein indicates areas where the Bluearth AE-50 may be slightly behind — typically sharper braking and sportier handling metrics. If maximum wet grip or sport handling is the priority, the Bluearth AE-50 may be a minor compromise compared with higher-ranked options.
- Learn more: Manufacturer information can be found at Yokohama and the tyre test page is here.
Overall comparison and recommendation: In the available head-to-head data (Autobild), the Vredestein Sportrac 5 is the better-performing tyre overall, finishing 11th vs Yokohama’s 13th out of 50. The difference is moderate: choose the Sportrac 5 if you prioritise sharper handling and slightly stronger test scores; choose the Bluearth AE-50 if you favour fuel economy, comfort and a tyre that still ranks highly in large independent tests. For most drivers either tyre is a sensible choice, but for marginally better test results and a sportier drive, Vredestein holds the edge.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 37,7 | 40,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 36,4 | 30,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 37,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
