Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle3. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle4. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Nokian zLine
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 35,3 | 34,7 | |||||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 | 35,7 | 32,4 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
