Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.383. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 209 | 93 | 116 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
