Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama Advan Sport V105 and Nokian zLine, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Advan Sport V105 and the zLine were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama Advan Sport V105 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R23 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
1. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 209 | 93 | 116 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||