Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 vs. Michelin Primacy 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Yokohama (57%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 and Michelin Primacy 4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Michelin Primacy 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Michelin Primacy 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
