Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
