Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Westlake (36%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 57% compared to 36% of the Westlake ZuperEco Z-107. The first tyre test of Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 was done in 2024, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the ZuperEco Z-107 and the Roadhawk were tested.
| # | Westlake ZuperEco Z-107
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 | 38,6 | 31,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
