Segment
1. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost2. Rotalla RH 01 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake Z-107 vs. Rotalla RH 01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla). Generally, Westlake summer tyres are slightly better rated (36%) than Rotalla (0%). But when it comes to comparing Westlake Z-107 and Rotalla RH 01, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Z-107 and the RH 01 were tested.
| # | Westlake Z-107
| Rotalla RH 01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Rotalla RH 01 44.
Worst position in test
2. Rotalla RH 01 44.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Rotalla RH 01 Rating: Poor | 3,2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
