Segment
1. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake Z-107 vs. Debica Presto HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Westlake (36%). The first tyre test of Westlake Z-107 was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Debica Presto HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Z-107 and the Presto HP2 were tested.
| # | Westlake Z-107
| Debica Presto HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | 2,3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
