Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle3. Westlake SW608 Lowcost4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake SW608 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Westlake SW608 31.4
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 40.9 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37.9 | 28.1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 39,3 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Westlake SW608 | 34,2 | 28 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Westlake SW608 | 37 | 36,2 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,4 | 27,2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
