Segment
1. Westlake SW608 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Westlake (0%). The first tyre test of Westlake SW608 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SW608 and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Westlake SW608
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Westlake SW608 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Debica Frigo HP2 17.332. Westlake SW608 31.4
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 40.9 | ||||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 39,3 | ||||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||